Development of entrepreneurship in the context of civilizational dynamics
HSS-okładka-27-2020-01-inter
PDF

Keywords

entrepreneurship
civilization theory
digital society

Abstract

Recent years has witnessed a dramatic growth of different schools of entrepreneurship. In response to problems related to the environment, social development, and other co-occurring factors reported in the past few last years, the authors aimed to examine the roots of economic growth and large-scale structural transformations. We suggest that these transformations are based on civilizational theory. Accounting for the wealth of information in the sphere of civilizational development, the authors conducted research on the economic and social paradigms of entrepreneurial theory. Using the monographic method, the authors
demonstrated that evolutional institutional theory is the best way of crafting the foundation of civilization into the so-called “digital economy” in which the world is starting to live in.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2020.hss.8
PDF

References

Arefieva, O.V., Gerasymchuk, N.A. (2006). Managing of entrepreneurship formation. Kyiv.

Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture of social forecasting. N.Y.: Basic Books.

Brzezinski, Z. (1971). International Politics in the Technetronic Era. Sofia: University Press.

Drucker, P. (2008). Essential Drucker: Management, the Individual and Society. HarperBusiness, 368.

Ganushchak, L. (2016). The decision-making process in regards to the economic integration of small and medium businesses. “Management” No. 23.

Gerasymchuk, N., Kondratiuk, O., Vikarchuk, O. (2009). Organization of production. “Zhytomir State University Publishing” 244.

Gerasymchuk N.А. (2016). Entrepreneurial mechanism of resource-saving development in agro productional complex, Kyiv.

Hayek, F. (1989). The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek. University of Chicago Press.

Huntington, S.P. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations. Foreign affairs.

Ierokhin, S.A. (2002). Strukturna transformatsiia natsionalnoi ekonomiky (teoretyko-meto-dolohichnyi aspekt). Kyiv: Svit Znan.

Naisbitt, J. (1994). Global paradox. William Morrow & Co.

Shejko, S.V., Kolodiy, O.S. (2018). Philosophical and educational foundations of the personality development of the higher school teacher in the 21st century. Management of the 21st century: globalization challenges: [monograph].

Toffler, A., Toffler, H. (1995). Creating a New Civilization : The Politics of the Third Wave. Turner Pub, 112.

Toft, M.D. (2003). The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Toynbee, A.J. (2001). Understanding History [translated to Russian by E.D. Zharkova, M., Rolf].

Zhao, Q., Huang, J. (2011). Roadmap of Resource Saving Agricultural Science and Technology Development. Agricultural Science & Technology in China: A Roadmap to 2050.