Abstrakt
The aim of the paper is to identify the drivers of innovation-friendly procurements. The research sample consists of 307 firms acting as contractors in public procurement in Poland. Our dataset has been constructed by utilizing data gathered in 2020 within the framework of the DIALOG 0260/20185 project, funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education. We apply the logit model with the propensity for innovation related to public procurement as the dependent variable and possible drivers of innovation-friendly procurement as the independent variables. Our main findings reveal significant distinctions between firms that introduced innovations related to public procurement and firms that did not, in particular with respect to firm size and scale of activity, orientation on public sector, and cooperation with the universities.
Bibliografia
Augliera, M. (2022). Is excessive public procurement a brake on firms' innovative output? An analysis applied to the Italian context. “Sinappsi”, Vol. 12, No. 3.
Aschhoff, B., Sofka, W. (2009). Innovation on Demand: Can Public Procurement Drive Market Success of Innovations?. “Research Policy”, Vol. 38, No. 8.
Blind, K., Pohlisch, J., Rainville, A. (2020). Innovation and standardization as drivers of companies’ success in public procurement: an empirical analysis. “The Journal of Technology Transfer”, Vol. 45, No. 3.
Cabral, L., Cozzi, G., Denicolo, V., Spagnolo, G., Zanza, M. (2006). Procuring innovations [In:] Dimitri, N., Piga, G. Spagnolo, G., eds., Handbook of Procurement. Cambridge MA: Cambridge: University Press.
Caravella, S., Crespi, F. (2021). The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. “Economics of Innovation and New Technology”, Vol. 30, No. 7.
Cave, J., Frinking, E. (2003). Public procurement and R&D. Access on the internet: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/jakcave/publications/pp_for_rd.pdf.
Divella, M., Sterlacchini, A. (2020). Public procurement for innovation: firm-level evidence from Italy and Norway. “Industrial and Corporate Change”, Vol. 29, No. 6.
Edler, J., Georghiou, L. (2007). Public Procurement and Innovation – Resurrecting the Demand Side. “Research Policy”, Vol. 36, No. 7.
Edquist, C., Hommen, L. (2000). Public technology procurement and innovation theory [In:] Edquist, C., Hommen, L., Tsipouri, L., eds., Public technology procurement and innovation. NY: Springer.
European Commission (2014). Public Procurement as a Driver of Innovation in SMEs and Public Services. Access on the internet: https://www.ecpar.org/files/public-procurement-driver-of-innovation.pdf.
Geroski, P.A. (1990). Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy. “International Review of Applied Economics”, Vol. 4, No. 2.
Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., Yeow, J. (2014). Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, Vol. 86.
Guerzoni, M., Raiteri, E. (2015). Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. “Research Policy”, Vol. 44, No. 3.
Lenderink, B., Halman, J.I.M., Voordijk, H. (2022). Innovation and public procurement: from fragmentation to synthesis on concepts, rationales and approaches. “Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research”, Vol. 35, No. 4.
Mazzucato, M. (2015). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public Vs. Private Sector Myths, Vol. 1. London: Anthem Press.
Odei, S.A., Hamplová, E. (2022). Innovations in small businesses: Do public procurement contracts and intellectual property rights matter? “Heliyon”, Vol. 8.
Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W. (1981). Industrial innovation and public policy. Preparing for the and the 1990s. London: Frances Pinter.
Sánchez-Carreira, M.D.C., Peñate-Valentín, M.C., Varela-Vázquez, P. (2019). Public Procurement of Innovation and Regional Development in Peripheral Areas. “Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research”, Vol. 32, No. 1.
Shin, K., Lee, J.-D. (2022). Impact of public procurement for innovation on firm productivity. “Applied Economics Letters”, Vol. 29, No. 11.
Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., Yeow, J. (2014). Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective. “Technovation”, Vol. 34, No. 10.
Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K. (2010). Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement, “European planning studies”, Vol. 18, No. 1.
Wooldridge, J.M., (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: The MIT Press.